Method for determining the reducing agent concentration (NH3) in the exhaust-gas flow of an internal combustion engine

ABSTRACT

A method for determining the reducing agent concentration (NH 3 ) in the exhaust-gas flow of an internal combustion engine, using a zeolitic NH 3  gas sensor that supplies a base measuring value, which is initially corrected by an offset value and a correction value that depends on the H 2 O concentration of the exhaust gas to form an intermediate value. The intermediate value is subsequently corrected by an additional value that depends on the NO x  and NH 3  concentration of the exhaust gas. In particular at or above the limits for the operating range, the accuracy of the method increases for one of the following conditions: gas compositions with NO x  concentrations &gt;500 ppm, extremely low NH 3  concentrations &lt;20 ppm or high NH 3  concentrations &gt;100 ppm.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

[0001] This application is based on and claims the priority date of German Application No. 101 42 236.9, filed on Aug. 29, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The invention relates to an improved method for determining the reducing agent concentration (NH₃) in the exhaust-gas flow of an internal combustion engine.

[0003] Nitrogen can be removed from diesel engine exhaust gases by using the selective catalytic reduction (SCR), with ammonia (NH₃) as reducing agent. For this purpose, ammonia is carried along in the vehicle either directly or in the form of a compound from which the ammonia is obtained. For the catalytic reduction reaction, ammonia is metered into the engine exhaust gas at a specific ratio to the NO_(x) content that is momentarily present in the exhaust gas. A stoichiometric NH₃— NO_(x) ratio must exist in order to achieve the maximum possible NO_(x) conversion. A lower ratio leads to a lower conversion while a higher ratio leads to a so-called “NH₃ breakthrough.” The optimum use of the nitrogen-removing catalytic converter is achieved with the aid of a zeolitic NH₃ gas sensor, which is installed as a control element or as an NH₃ breakthrough sensor in the exhaust-gas flow behind the catalytic converter. The NH₃— NO_(x) ratio can thus always be adjusted to the maximum possible NO_(x) conversion.

[0004] The use of a zeolitic NH₃ gas sensor requires that a connection be found between the measuring variable and the NH₃ concentration to be determined at the sensor. Besides the scaling, this connection is used to compute the compensation of undesirable lateral effects, in particular those to water (H2₀) in the form of water vapor in the exhaust gas.

[0005] A method for correcting the influence of H2₀ on the signal of an NH₃ gas sensor is known from German Patent No. DE 199 07 669 C1. The reference suggests determining a so-called zero-value function of the gas sensor, which is then used to correct the measuring values during the continued operation. In order to determine the zero-value function, the gas sensor signal is measured during several different operating phases of the engine while the engine is running, without feeding NH₃ to the catalytic converter system. The H₂O concentration in the exhaust gas, the so-called moisture equivalent FÄ (ME), is determined at the same time. The moisture equivalent characterizes the operating state of the engine and is determined from the fuel-mass flow together with the air-mass flow, or from the oxygen partial pressure of the exhaust gas—respectively also in combination with a moisture sensor for determining the H2₀ concentration in air that is suctioned in—or with a moisture sensor in the exhaust-gas flow. In all cases, the ascending gradient and the axial section of the zero-value function, which is approximated as a straight line, is determined from the measured values. In order to correct the measured values of the NH₃ sensor during operation, the respective zero-value function is determined and the measured sensor value is then corrected accordingly.

[0006] However, the known method has a number of disadvantages.

[0007] The delayed response (response threshold) of the NH₃ sensor for low NH₃ concentrations is not taken into account. In the same way, the influence of the NO_(x) gas components on the response threshold and the NH₃ sensitivity are not taken into account. When determining the zero-value function, a linear approximation of the dependence between measured value (Cp) and NH₃ concentration is made, which provides acceptable results only for NH₃ concentrations up to approximately 50 ppm. The adsorption and conversion behavior of the NH₃ sensor, which leads to a distortion of the gas composition arriving at the sensor, is also not taken into consideration.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0008] Thus, it is the object of the invention to provide a method for correcting the signal from a NH₃ sensor, which method provides an exact value for the measured NH₃ concentration, even with low NH₃ concentrations. At the same time, the method takes into account the adsorption behavior and the conversion behavior of the NH₃ sensor.

[0009] The above object generally is achieved according to the invention by a method for determining the reducing agent concentration (NH₃) in the exhaust-gas flow of an internal combustion engine with a (zeolitic) NH₃ gas sensor that supplies a base measuring value, wherein the base measuring value is initially corrected by an offset value and by a correction value that depends on the H₂O concentration of the exhaust gas to form an intermediate value. Following this, the intermediate value is corrected by an additional value that depends on the NO_(x) concentration of the exhaust gas to obtain a corrected NH₃ measuring value.

[0010] The values for the dependence of the measured values on the NO_(x) concentration and the NH₃ concentration are recorded in a 2-dimensional table.

[0011] The two adjacent columns in the table, which best match the given NO_(x) concentration, are selected to determine the NH₃ concentration. Following that, the line that best matches the first intermediate value is determined in the first selected column and the final measured value is then determined through interpolation, initially between the columns and then between the lines.

[0012] The invention is explained in further detail in the following with the aid of embodiments and Figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0013]FIG. 1 shows the NO_(x) correction of the NH₃ concentration at the sensor.

[0014]FIG. 2 shows comparison models for the measuring data.

[0015]FIG. 3 shows the NH₃ sensor response behavior in the expanded measuring range.

[0016]FIG. 4 shows a simplified equivalent circuit for the sensor.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0017] An extremely simplified sensor model was used and the following assumptions were made for the observations based on the initially mentioned prior art:

[0018] The parallel capacitance C_(p) in an equivalent circuit diagram for the sensor shown in FIG. 4 characterizes the NH₃ concentration. A linear dependence exists between the NH₃ concentration and the parallel capacitance C_(p) in the equivalent circuit diagram for the sensor. The equivalent circuit diagram shows that H₂O exerts a linear influence on the parallel capacitance C_(p), independent of the NH₃ concentration. Nitrogen oxides NO_(x) do not influence the sensor signal and no interaction occurs between the gas components.

[0019] Thus, it follows for the measured capacitance of the sensor element:

C _(p) =C _(p0) +v _(NH3)·NH₃ +v _(H2O·H) ₂O  (1)

[0020] C_(p): total capacitance of the sensor element

[0021] C_(pO): basic capacitance

[0022] v_(NH3): factor NH₃ influence

[0023] v_(H20): factor H2₀ influence

[0024] NH₃: concentration NH₃

[0025] H₂O: concentration H₂O

[0026] Relative to the searched-for NH₃ concentration and the measuring variable C_(p), the following results:

NH_(3model) =v′ _(NH3)·(C _(p) −C _(p) O)+v′ _(H20)·H₂O  (2)

[0027] The model has a simple formulation and uses only 3 (calibration) parameters along with 1 measured value.

[0028] The disadvantages of this correction method based on this model are as follows:

[0029] Delayed response (response threshold) for low NH₃ concentrations is not taken into account.

[0030] Influence of the NO_(x) gas components on the response threshold and the NH₃ sensitivity are not taken into account.

[0031] Experimentally determined, non-linear dependence between measured variable (C_(p)) and NH₃ concentration is approximated linearly, which supplies acceptable results only for NH₃ concentrations up to approximately 50 ppm.

[0032] Adsorption and conversion behavior of the sensor/packing that leads to a distortion of the gas composition arriving at the sensor are not taken into account.

[0033] The correction method based on this simple model does not meet the requirements for the exhaust gas system and the environmental conditions to be expected there with respect to measuring accuracy. The measuring error consists of three parts: the errors caused by the sensor, the model errors and the errors in the evaluation electronics (digitizing errors, signal noise, . . . ).

F_sought=F_sensor+F_model+F_electronics  (3)

[0034] In particular the influence of the lateral sensitivities caused by changes in the environmental conditions can be improved noticeably by reducing the model error.

[0035] The new method is based on the following findings:

[0036] In the >20 ppm range, a nearly logarithmic connection exists between the NH₃ concentration and C_(p).

[0037] With extremely low concentrations (<20 ppm), the increase in the capacitance is delayed; the delay is even greater if NO_(x) is present.

[0038] Even with higher NH₃ concentrations, there is a reduced sensitivity relative to NH₃ in the presence of nitrogen oxides.

[0039] Nitrogen oxides significantly influence the measuring results (interaction, side effect) only if NH₃ is present.

[0040] The influence of water on the measuring result without interaction to the NH₃ effect and in the range of 1-8vol % H2₀ is linear.

[0041] Thus, without taking into account the NO_(x) effects it follows that: $\begin{matrix} {C_{p} = {C_{p0} + {v_{NH3}^{*} \cdot {\log \left( {\frac{{NH}_{3}}{s_{{NH}_{3}}} + 1} \right)}} + {{v_{H2O} \cdot H_{2}}0}}} & (4) \end{matrix}$

[0042] C_(p): total capacitance of the sensor element

[0043] C_(pO): basic capacitance

[0044] V_(NH3): factor NH₃ influence (sensitivity)

[0045] NH₃: concentration NH₃

[0046] S_(NH3): factor for characterizing the NH₃ influence

[0047] V_(H20): factor for characterizing the H₂O influence

[0048] H₂O: concentration H₂O

[0049] However, due to the presence of nitrogen oxides, catalytic surfaces, adsorption and decomposition reactions, a portion of the NH₃ molecules already react at the sensor and cannot be detected by this sensor. FIG. 1 shows an example of the difference between NH₃ concentration in the gas and the concentration that contributes to the measuring effect in the sensor.

[0050] To compensate for this influence, the NH₃ term from equation (4) is replaced with the corrected one: $\begin{matrix} {{NH}_{3{sensor}} = {{\frac{{NH}_{3}^{p}}{{NH}_{3}^{p} + \Delta}{NH}_{3}} = \frac{{NH}_{3}^{p + 1}}{{NH}_{3}^{p} + \Delta}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

[0051] p: influence parameter NO_(x) (width of transition zone)

[0052] NH₃: NH₃ concentration in the gas

[0053] NH_(3sensor): sensor-effective NH₃ concentration

[0054] With the following dependence:

Δ=α_(NO) +x _(NO) ·N ₀  (6)

[0055] α_(NO): influencing parameters of NO_(x)-independent processes (adsorption, catalytic conversion)

[0056] V_(NO): influencing parameters NO_(x)

[0057] NO: concentration of nitrogen oxides NO_(x)

[0058] In the borderline case Δ→O or with extremely high NH₃ concentrations, equation (5) changes over to NH_(3corr)=NH₃. Based on equations (4), (5) and (6), it follows for the corrected total capacitance Cp: $\begin{matrix} {C_{p} = {C_{pO} + {v_{NH3} \cdot {\log \left( {\frac{{NH}_{3}^{p + 1} \cdot s_{NH3}}{{NH}_{3}^{p} + \alpha_{NO} + {v_{NO} \cdot {NO}}} + 1} \right)}} + {{v_{H20} \cdot H_{2}}0}}} & (7) \end{matrix}$

[0059] The advantages of the new method become clear even in the typical, narrow operating range of the NH₃ sensor with maximum 100 ppm NH₃ and up to 1000 ppm NO. It is easy to see in FIG. 2 that a linear approximation to the measuring results would provide noticeably poorer results.

[0060] The following maximum error therefore can be expected for a use range of:

[0061] 1-8 vol % H2₀ and

[0062] 0-100 ppm NH₃, as well as

[0063] 0/500/1000 ppm NO_(x), ΔCp/Pf prior art: invention:   0 ppm NO 0.53 0.05  500 ppm NO 0.37 0.09 1000 ppm NO 0.87 0.11 maximum 0.87 (18 ppm NH₃) 0.11 (2 ppm NH₃)

[0064] Further taking into account the fact that measuring errors stemming from the measuring instruments in use and the configuration also enter into this error, an improvement by at least a factor of 8 can be assumed, even for the limited operating range.

[0065] In particular at/above the limits of the operating range and given one of following conditions

[0066] gas compositions with NO_(x) concentrations >500 ppm

[0067] extremely low NH₃ concentrations <20 ppm

[0068] high NH₃ concentrations >100 ppm

[0069] the advance in the prediction accuracy increases even further. This is shown clearly with the measuring results shown in FIG. 3 for the expanded range.

[0070] As a result of the noticeable increase in the complexity of the model, the equation (7) unfortunately can no longer be algebraically transposed to NH₃. Furthermore, the microcontroller, used so far for the signal processing, would no longer be able to perform the necessary calculations during the time available for this.

[0071] The alternative of using a complete tabulation is not practical since a large amount of memory is required as a result of the 3 influencing variables. If the equation (7) is divided into the three components

C _(p) =C _(P) O+C _(p)(NH₃NO_(x))+C _(p)(H₂O),  (8)

[0072] it becomes obvious that the no-load capacitance Cp₀ as well as the H₂O term can be eliminated through subtraction. The 2 parameters required for this are stored in the non-volatile memory of the electronics. The H₂O concentration is obtained from external data. The remaining dependencies on NH₃ and NO concentrations are stored, as shown in Table 1, in a 2-dimensional table, a so-called lateral sensitivity table. TABLE 1 lateral sensitivity table ΔCp/pF NO_(x) = 0 ppm NO_(x) = 100 ppm NO_(x) = 200 ppm _(NH3) = 0 ppm 0.0 0.0 0.0 _(NH3) = 20 ppm 1.1 1.0 0.9 _(NH3) = 40 ppm 1.6 1.5 1.4 _(NH3) = 60 ppm 2.0 1.9 1.8 . . . . . . . . . . . .

[0073] The algorithm effect on the total operational sequence occurs rather early:

[0074] Sensor element production;

[0075] Scanning of corner data based on the framework conditions for the algorithm and measuring of the sensors at these points;

[0076] Regression of model parameters by means of previously determined measuring data;

[0077] Determination of 2 parameters for C_(p)O and H₂O

[0078] Computation of the above-mentioned value tables by means of an algorithm and the framework conditions for the area of use;

[0079] Storage of characteristic data and the table in the microcontroller memory;

[0080] Deployment of the sensor by using an interpolation algorithm.

[0081] The sensor electronics determines the NH₃ concentration from the measuring value C_(p) with the following steps:

[0082] Subtraction of the no-load capacitance from the measured value with stored parameter C_(p)O;

[0083] Subtraction of the H₂O influence with H₂O parameter and supplied H₂O concentration;

[0084] The two adjacent columns in the lateral sensitivity table with the closest match to the predetermined NO_(x) concentration are selected;

[0085] By using a search algorithm (e.g. bisection method), the line that most closely matches the converted measuring value in the first selected column is determined;

[0086] Through linear interpolation between initially the columns and then the lines, the NH₃ value is determined through projection onto the NH₃ line association.

[0087] Output of the NH₃ concentration that is determined.

[0088] By using these steps, the complete algorithm can be realized through elementary operations such as addition and multiplication. The error resulting from the linear interpolation can be kept extremely low through a suitable selection of the support or restart points in the table. It is advantageous if a higher support point density is selected in regions of high non-linearity.

[0089] The invention now being fully described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as set forth herein. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for determining the reducing agent concentration (NH₃) in the exhaust-gas flow of an internal combustion engine with an NH₃ gas sensor that supplies a base measuring value, comprising initially correcting the base measuring value by an offset value and a correction value that depends on the H₂O concentration in the exhaust gas to obtain an intermediate value; and subsequently changing the intermediate value with the aid of the NO_(x) concentration in the exhaust gas to provide a corrected NH₃ measuring value.
 2. The method according to claim 1, including storing the values for the dependence on the NO_(x) and the NH₃ concentrations in a 2-dimensional table.
 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the step of changing includes: selecting the two adjacent columns in the table that best match the given NO_(x) concentration; determining the line in the first selected column that best matches the first intermediate value; and determining the final measuring value through interpolation, initially between the columns and then between the lines. 